Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41883434›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of experimental medicine2026

Neurobiological mechanisms linking vitamin d signaling to cognitive decline and neurodegeneration: Untangling epidemiology, pathophysiology, and evidence.

Neha Choudhary, Maheen Zahid, Muhammad Ahmad, Muneeba Shaukat, Muhammad Tariq, Soura Rajeshwara, Shermeen Usman, Taimoor Wajid, Ayoola Awosika

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of experimental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Neha ChoudharyDepartment of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.
Maheen ZahidDepartment of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.
Muhammad AhmadDepartment of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.
Muneeba ShaukatDepartment of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.
Muhammad TariqDepartment of Medicine, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar 54000, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Soura RajeshwaraDepartment of Medicine, Shimoga Institute of Medical Sciences, Karnataka 577201, India.
Shermeen UsmanDepartment of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.
Taimoor WajidDepartment of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan.
Ayoola AwosikaDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine Peoria, Bloomington, IL 61601, United States. ayoolaawosika@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dementia is a leading cause of disability and dependence among older adults, and its prevalence is projected to increase sharply with age. While age and genetics remain the dominant risk factors, modifiable contributors are gaining attention, including vitamin D deficiency, which is highly prevalent worldwide. This integrated review synthesizes current evidence on the association between vitamin D status and dementia, spanning the epidemiological, mechanistic, and interventional domains. Epidemiological studies have consistently linked low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels with poorer cognition, faster decline, and higher risk of Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia, although causality cannot be inferred. Mechanistic data suggest that vitamin D regulates amyloid and tau pathology, reduces neuroinflammation and oxidative stress, supports cerebrovascular integrity, and preserves mitochondrial function. Translation into clinical benefit has proven difficult; large randomized trials in generally healthy older adults, including VITAL and D-Health, report null effects, whereas smaller studies in vitamin D-deficient or cognitively impaired populations suggest potential improvements. Meta-analyses confirm mixed findings, typically indicating small or non-significant effects, with possible benefit restricted to vulnerable groups. The limitations across the literature include residual confounding in observational studies, assay variability, seasonal influences, heterogeneous cognitive measures, and publication bias. Future priorities include adequately powered randomized trials with standardized vitamin D assessments and harmonized cognitive endpoints as well as investigations into genetic moderators and multi-domain interventions. In conclusion, although vitamin D deficiency is consistently associated with cognitive decline and dementia, definitive evidence of causality remains lacking. Clarifying whether supplementation can alter dementia trajectory is a pressing public health priority.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseCognitive declineDementiaNeurodegenerationVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID41883434
PMCPMC13010592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.