ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2025
Evaluation of Intra-operative Patient-specific Methods for Point Cloud Completion for Minimally Invasive Liver Interventions.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Resolving the Ambiguity of Complete-to-Partial Point Cloud Registration for Image-Guided Liver Surgery With Patches-to-Partial Matching.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The registration between the pre-operative model and the intra-operative surface is crucial in image-guided liver surgery, as it facilitates the effective use of pre-operative information during the procedure. However, the intra-operative surface, usually represented as a point cloud, often has limited coverage, especially in laparoscopic surgery, and is prone to holes and noise, posing significant challenges for registration methods. Point cloud completion methods have the potential to alleviate these issues. Thus, we explore six state-of-the-art point cloud completion methods to identify the optimal completion method for liver surgery applications. We focus on a patient-specific approach for liver point cloud completion from a partial liver surface under three cases: canonical pose, non-canonical pose, and canonical pose with noise. The transformer-based method, AdaPoinTr, outperforms all other methods to generate a complete point cloud from the given partial liver point cloud under the canonical pose. On the other hand, our findings reveal substantial performance degradation of these methods under non-canonical poses and noisy settings, highlighting the limitations of these methods, which suggests the need for a robust point completion method for its application in image-guided liver surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.