ReviewTherapeutic advances in reproductive health
Knowledge, role and perceptions of male partners on pre-eclampsia in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of evidence from qualitative and quantitative studies.
Review in Therapeutic advances in reproductive health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on: Knowledge, role and perceptions of male partners on pre-eclampsia in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review of evidence from qualitative and quantitative studies.Therapeutic advances in reproductive healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pre-eclampsia is a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy and a major cause of maternal and neonatal mortality worldwide, with a disproportionately high burden in sub-Saharan Africa. Objective: This review synthesised evidence on how men engage with pre-eclampsia in the region. Design: This systematic review included qualitative designs and cross-sectional studies. Data sources and methods: Search was done across five primary databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science). Additional searches were carried out in online sources like institutional repositories, HINARI, Dimensions AI and Google Scholar for studies published between 2000 and 2025. This review followed PRISMA guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) framework. Data were appraised using JBI tools and synthesised thematically. Results: Twelve studies from Tanzania, Uganda, Ghana, Nigeria and Mozambique were included. Knowledge of pre-eclampsia varied widely; that is, only 24.8% of men demonstrated high awareness, while misconceptions, such as attributing the condition to stress, cold or supernatural forces, were common. Men's roles spanned financial provision, decision-making, emotional and household support and information sharing, but overall involvement was moderate. Perceptions were shaped by cultural, social and spiritual narratives, while health system barriers such as unclear roles and exclusionary practices reduced engagement. Conclusion: Male partners' knowledge, perceptions and roles significantly affect maternal outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa. Findings show the need for targeted education, culturally sensitive interventions and health system reforms that encourage male participation. Strengthening men's engagement could reduce delays in care-seeking, improve antenatal care utilisation and contribute to lowering maternal and neonatal mortality. Trial registration: Open Science Framework with the DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/WHB93.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.