Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41883368›Full record

ArticleEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.)2026

Cigarette Smoking-Regulated

Yanping Xiao, Jinyue Zhang, Yu Jia, Hui Song, Zhenguang Mao, Fang Gao, Rui Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environment & health (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yanping XiaoDepartments of Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Genomics, the Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, Center for Global Health, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China.
Jinyue ZhangDepartments of Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Genomics, the Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, Center for Global Health, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China.
Yu JiaDepartments of Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Genomics, the Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, Center for Global Health, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China.
Hui SongDepartments of Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Genomics, the Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, Center for Global Health, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China.
Zhenguang MaoDepartments of Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Genomics, the Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, Center for Global Health, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China.
Fang GaoDepartments of Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Genomics, the Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, Center for Global Health, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China.
Rui ZhengDepartments of Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Genomics, the Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, Center for Global Health, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7020-3354

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanism by which cigarette smoking affects bladder cancer susceptibility via glucose metabolism remains unclear. We identified bladder cancer-specific glucose metabolism-related genes (GMGs) using Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) and a case-control study (580 cases and 1,101 controls) through genetic association and interaction analyses with cigarette smoking. Among 811 GMGs, we observed that

Indexed as

bladder cancercGMP-PKG signaling pathwaycigarette smokingglucose metabolism reprogrammingPRKCE

Identifiers

PMID41883368
PMCPMC13010304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.