ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Cosmetic after-feel modulates brain activity in sensory and reward networks: an fMRI study.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The affective dimensions of cosmetic textures were investigated using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine how after-feel, defined as residual tactile sensations persisting on the skin after product application, modulates sensory and emotional processing. Twenty healthy women took part in three conditions: no cream (control), cream A, or cream B, differing only in emulsifier composition. A fixed amount of cream was applied to predefined areas of the left hand. After absorption, participants stroked these areas at a controlled speed. fMRI data were acquired during this self-touch task, preprocessed using a standardized pipeline, and analyzed using a general linear model. Results showed that the no-cream and cream B conditions primarily engaged primary somatosensory regions, consistent with basic tactile encoding. In contrast, cream A additionally recruited brain areas involved in affective and reward processing, including the orbitofrontal cortex, amygdala, and putamen, with key reward-related responses, notably within striatal and insular regions, showing a right-hemispheric dominance contralateral to the hand receiving the tactile input. This broader activation pattern suggests that specific cosmetic ingredients can enhance the emotional salience of after-feel, potentially through C-tactile afferent pathways mediating affective tactile signals. These findings reflect a hierarchical integration of tactile input, from sensory encoding to higher-order affective appraisal. They highlight the potential of cosmetic formulations to influence central touch representation beyond surface-level sensation. This proof-of-concept study offers novel insights into how the sensory and emotional qualities of cosmetic products take shape in the brain, providing a neuroscientific foundation for the development of emotionally engaging textures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.