ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026
Illicit substances in school-confiscated vapes: Lessons from a laboratory-driven public health pilot.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Youth vaping in UK schools has escalated, with reports of vapes sold as THC products containing synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) and other illicit substances, prompting health emergencies. This pilot study aimed to determine the prevalence and types of illicit substances present in vapes confiscated from secondary schools to inform future public health surveillance and interventions. Study design: Cross-sectional pilot study of confiscated vaping products collected from secondary schools in a defined UK region. Methods: In May 2025, 80 secondary schools in the Black Country and West Birmingham were invited to donate confiscated vapes. Seven schools participated, and 212 vape products were collected in July 2025. LC-QTOF-MS screened for illicit substances, with confirmatory LC-MS/MS for SCRAs. Results: Confiscated devices comprised 161 disposable vapes (76%), 32 refillable devices, and 19 vape liquids (mean 30.1 per school; 95% CI 17.9-42). Of these, 204 samples were analysed, 14 samples from six schools contained illicit substances (6.9%): SCRAs were dominant (MDMB-4en-PINACA n = 13), plus 4F-MDMB-BINACA (n = 4), 5F-ADB (n = 2), MDMB-PINACA (n = 1); one liquid had all four SCRAs plus ecstasy, ketamine, mephedrone and ethcathinone. Half of positive vapes were disposable; the remaining seven included six were refillable and one liquid. Conclusions: Illicit substances, particularly SCRAs also known as Spice, were detected in vapes confiscated from schools. SCRAs are frequently confused with natural cannabis. SCRAs are not natural cannabinoids but more potent and dangerous synthetic compounds. Improved awareness and understanding of their potential harms are critical for informing public health messaging and safeguarding young people. Multi-agency collaboration and laboratory surveillance of confiscated items are essential to enable targeted education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.