Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41883356›Full record

ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026

A GP drop-in clinic model providing holistic community care in family hubs: Service evaluation findings and next steps.

Alexandra Macnamara, Joseph Witney, Helen Christmas, Syeda Nudrat, Kate Morton, Sarah Blower

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexandra MacnamaraLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
Joseph WitneyHaxby Group, Hull, United Kingdom.
Helen ChristmasHull City Council, United Kingdom.
Syeda NudratHumber Teaching NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
Kate MortonUniversity of York, United Kingdom.
Sarah BlowerUniversity of York, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The first few years of life are vital in building the foundations for a child's healthy development, with the needs of the whole family having an impact on how children grow and develop. In addition, many families living in deprived areas face multiple barriers and inequalities in accessing high quality primary care.A new approach to improving access to primary care was developed in the form of a drop-in GP clinic based in a Family Hub. The model allows families with young children to see a GP as a whole family, with no appointment time restrictions, and the ability to see the same GP at every contact. This provides continuity of care and the opportunity to deliver preventative and holistic care in the context of the whole family.This service evaluation aimed to explore the reach and impact of the new service on families and practitioners. Study design: This was a service evaluation based on clinical data and qualitative interviews. Methods: Clinical data from consultations were used to inform the evaluation, and interviews were undertaken with eight parents and nine Family Hub staff members. Codebook thematic analysis was used to summarise the findings. Results: In the first six months, 78 family members used the drop-in service in 135 consultations. Most consultations focused on chronic issues such as gastrointestinal issues, mental health and social and neurodiversity concerns.Four main themes identified from the interview data were: clinical benefits, experiences of accessing and engaging with healthcare, logistics and practicalities, and wider system questions. Families and staff spoke positively about the benefits of the service, including helping to overcome barriers to accessing care, reducing use of emergency services, families having trust and reassurance in the healthcare system, reducing overtreatment, the partnership working with other professionals and families feeling their concerns were taken seriously. Possible limitations included reliance on a single GP, lack of understanding from some families about how to access the service and recognition that the service provided care for pre-school aged children only. Those interviewed felt an expansion of the service into other geographical areas would be beneficial. Conclusions: The interviews demonstrated a range of benefits from the drop-in model and suggested that this helped to overcome some of the challenges and barriers some families face in accessing usual care in a primary care setting, in addition to providing a more satisfying care experience for both families and clinician.The next steps for this work will aim to test the viability and cost-effectiveness of this model on a larger scale, including providing the service in another Family Hub and exploring opportunities to test this model in different settings.

Indexed as

Child healthHealth inequalitiesPrimary carePublic health

Identifiers

PMID41883356
PMCPMC13010100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.