ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026
Barriers and facilitators to community-led interventions to improve housing stability: A case study across four communities.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: In communities across the U.S., lack of affordable and stable housing is a growing public health problem. Limited practice-based evidence is available to support community-engaged efforts to address housing instability via local-level policy and system changes. Using a case study approach, our evaluation aimed to assess community-engaged approaches to address housing instability; and to identify facilitators and barriers that influence progress towards local-level policy and system-level changes to advance housing stability. Study design: Mixed methods evaluation approach. Methods: Four community-based organizations (CBOs) in Colorado were included in the evaluation between 2021 and 2024. CBOs were funded as part of a larger a multi-site evaluation assessing community-engaged efforts to advance health equity through policy- and system-changes in their local community. Data were triangulated across multiple sources including semiannual reporting of core evaluation metrics, quarterly progress reports, and qualitative interviews. Results: CBOs identified key factors that influenced their efforts to advance housing stability in their community. Embedded historic social inequities emerged as a salient factor that impeded progress towards policy and system-level changes. The triangulated evaluation findings revealed three overarching strategies used by CBOs to advance their work: 1) Community engagement and capacity building proved meaningful tools to CBOs; 2) Strategic partnerships were critical, though organizations in smaller communities had fewer local resources available; 3) Understanding and adapting to local conditions was necessary for organizations to capitalize on social momentum. Conclusions: While housing instability is a growing public health challenge that will require multilevel solutions, local-level efforts will be important to develop tailored interventions that account for the unique contextual factors contributing to local challenges. Our findings aim to support CBOs working to improve housing stability and provide a model for successful approaches to community-led initiatives, especially for smaller and more remote communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.