ArticlePrimary health care research & development2026
Chronic care management in primary care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Amazonas.
Article in Primary health care research & development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundConducting health systems assessments helps highlight weaknesses and strengths to be explored to improve care delivery. The Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) considers the perspective of professionals who work in the care-providing institution. Its structure comprises seven dimensions that provide specific data about the care offered. Objectives: (1) evaluate the institutional capacity for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) management in the interior of the State of Amazonas from the perspective of health professionals; (2) verify the association between socio-educational, work and geographic location variables with the dimensions of the ACIC.
methodsA cross-sectional study carried out between October 2020 and December 2022 in 36 Primary Health Units (PHUs) of the seven cities of the Amazonas, totaling 230 participants. Excel 2019 and R (4.2.1) were used for data analysis. The association between independent variables and ACIC dimensions was analyzed using multiple logistic regression analysis.
resultThe PHUs in the rural Amazonas have the basic capacity to care for patients with T2DM. Analysis of each dimension of the ACIC demonstrated that geographic location was the most relevant factor, showing an association with all instrument dimensions.
conclusionsSocioeducational variables showed an association with the dimensions of Decision Support, Design of the Service Delivery System, Clinical Information System, and Integration of components of the Care Model for Chronic Conditions. Work-related variables, on the other hand, were associated with the dimensions of Organization of Health Care, Community Resources, Support for Self-Management and Integration of the components of the Chronic Conditions Care Model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.