ArticleBiology open2026
Recycling of Vps68 depends on retromer and Mvp1/SNX8.
Article in Biology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Here, we analyzed the recycling of the Vps55/Vps68 complex in the yeast endocytic pathway. The two proteins seem to form a functional unit. Single deletions of VPS55 or VPS68 affected the turnover of the endocytic cargo protein Ste6 to the same degree. The double deletion had no additive effect on Ste6 turnover. Vps55 and Vps68 were dependent on each other for proper cellular localization. Under normal conditions, the sfGFP-tagged proteins localized to punctate structures; but, when the corresponding partner protein was missing, staining of the vacuolar lumen was observed. This suggests that the orphaned proteins are degraded in the vacuole via the multivesicular bodies (MVB) pathway. A tyrosine-based recycling signal was identified in the cytosolic tail of Vps68. This signal completely restored retromer-dependent recycling and function of a Vps10 variant devoid of its own recycling signals. In line with this finding, Vps68 recycling turned out to be dependent on both retromer and Mvp1/SNX8. This finding was unexpected, since Vps55 recycling seems to depend solely on Mvp1. In co-immunoprecipitation experiments, a weak co-immunoprecipitation signal was detected between Mvp1 and the retromer subunit Vps26, indicating a physical association between Mvp1 and retromer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.