Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41883078›Full record

ArticleMolecular informatics2026

Interpretable and Scalable Similarity Metrics for DNA-Encoded Library Design Using Generative Topographic Mapping.

Louis Plyer, Alexey A Orlov, Tagir N Akhmetshin, Erik Yeghyan, Fanny Bonachera, Dragos Horvath, Alexandre Varnek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Louis PlyerLaboratory of Chemoinformatics, UMR 7140 CNRS, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9139-8822
Alexey A OrlovLaboratory of Chemoinformatics, UMR 7140 CNRS, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Tagir N AkhmetshinLaboratory of Chemoinformatics, UMR 7140 CNRS, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Erik YeghyanLaboratory of Chemoinformatics, UMR 7140 CNRS, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Fanny BonacheraLaboratory of Chemoinformatics, UMR 7140 CNRS, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Dragos HorvathLaboratory of Chemoinformatics, UMR 7140 CNRS, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0173-5714
Alexandre VarnekLaboratory of Chemoinformatics, UMR 7140 CNRS, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1886-925X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing number and size of DNA-encoded libraries (DELs), together with the vast space of possible DEL designs, demand interpretable and scalable criteria for selecting which libraries to construct and screen against a given target. An ideal target-focused DEL shows both strong similarity with an active reference compound collection and high intra-DEL diversity. Chemography with Generative Topographic Mapping (GTM) was shown to be a promising approach for selecting DELs, offering both intuitive visualization and fast quantitative analysis scalable to thousands of DEL designs. This is achieved by defining each library by a "stand-alone" vector, the comparison of which precludes costly pairwise inter-molecular similarity calculations. However, the extent to which such "stand-alone" (SA) approaches in general, and GTM-derived SA metrics in particular, recover DELs that are reference-proximal and chemically diverse as evaluated by conventional compound pair-matching (CP) metrics in the initial descriptor space remains insufficiently characterized. In this article, the comparative analysis of the Morgan count fingerprint-based chemical-library similarity versus GTM-derived metrics, using 100 diverse DEL subsets and a reference set of compounds tested against cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) from ChEMBL, was performed. GTM-based SA metrics provide robust approximations for "gold standard" molecular descriptor space CP metrics for DEL selection: Spearman rank correlations fall in the 0.6-0.7 range. Our results demonstrate that GTM helps to identify DELs that best span the reference space according to same "gold standard" molecular descriptor space metrics: SA GTM-driven rankings of libraries achieve enrichment factors at 5% (EF5%) of 4-12 (in terms of finding "gold standard" top libraries within the 5% best ranked by GTM)-always picking 2 out of the top 3 libraries. The accompanying two-dimensional landscapes make intra- and interlibrary diversity visually accessible, supporting rapid, interpretable screening of alternative DEL designs. Collectively, these results position GTM as an efficient tool for chemical-library similarity assessment and target-focused DEL selection.

Indexed as

DNAGene LibrarySmall Molecule LibrariesDNASmall Molecule Librarieschemical librarieschemical spacechemographydimensionality reductionGenerative Topographic Mapping

Identifiers

PMID41883078
PMCPMC13019124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.