ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Docking of millions: accelerating a million-scale virtual screening using deep learning.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Virtual screening is a critical step in computer-aided drug discovery. As synthetic databases and reaction schemes expand, the number of synthesizable compounds grows, making efficient screening essential. The success of ultra-large-scale virtual screening hinges on two factors: accuracy in binding affinity prediction and speed. We previously developed AK-Score2 for accurate protein-ligand binding prediction and V-Dock for estimating docking scores. Here, we present Docking of Millions (DoM), an ultra-large-scale virtual screening system integrating both methods. Iterative learning of V-Dock to approximate AK-Score2-based affinities accelerates screening by eliminating the need to dock all compounds, saving time and resources. In benchmarking, screening 5 million compounds against DDR1, c-kit, ASK1, NSD1, CREBBP, and PDE5, DoM consumed only 319 h on average, 12% of full library screening time. Also, it achieved an average retrieval rate of 89% in the top 100 compounds. Inhibition assays identified that 1 out of 27 and 4 out of 31 molecules suppressed ASK1 and DDR1 activity by more than 50% at 10 μM. Further validation of selected compounds identified that the lowest IC50 values are 1.96 μM and 788 nM for ASK1 and DDR1, respectively. These findings demonstrate DoM as a practical and efficient platform for real-world drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.