Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41882991›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular electrophysiology2026

Left Atrial Posterior Wall Functional Remodeling in Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. A Pilot Study.

Michael M Malaty, Natasha Trevaskis, Kerissa Govender, Aaron L Sverdlov, Bradley R Wilsmore, Malcolm Barlow, Nicholas Jackson, Gwilym M Morris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael M MalatyDepartment of Cardiology, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6399-4282
Natasha TrevaskisDepartment of Cardiology, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Kerissa GovenderDepartment of Cardiology, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Aaron L SverdlovDepartment of Cardiology, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Bradley R WilsmoreDepartment of Cardiology, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Malcolm BarlowDepartment of Cardiology, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Nicholas JacksonDepartment of Cardiology, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Gwilym M MorrisDepartment of Cardiology, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

Heart Foundation of Australia Future Leader Fellowship 106025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) is often targeted in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation due to its shared properties with pulmonary veins. However, substrate-guided approaches using structural markers have shown inconsistent results. We investigated posterior wall conduction time (PWCT) as a novel and functional marker of LAPW remodeling in AF patients.

methodsIn our pilot study, 40 patients undergoing first-time AF ablation (20 paroxysmal, 20 persistent AF) were included. AF cycle length (AF CL), PW linear conduction, PW conduction area (PWCA) and PWCT were evaluated on electroanatomical mapping at different pacing CLs. Major decremental PWCT was defined as PWCT increase ≥ 17% at 400 ms compared to 600 ms.

resultsPersistent AF patients had a larger posterior wall area (PWA; 20.4 ± 5.2 vs. 16.8 ± 4.9 cm², p = 0.033), greater low voltage area (LVA; 16.5 ± 25.8% vs. 6.1 ± 19.8%, p = 0.044) and shorter left atrial appendage AF CLs (shortest AF CL 146.2 ± 36.3 vs. 179.1 ± 37.1 ms, p = 0.012) than paroxysmal AF patients. PWCT was numerically longer in persistent AF, with major ΔPWCT observed exclusively in 6 persistent AF patients. In this subgroup, PWCA was reduced at each 10 ms increment during 400 ms pacing, a finding not observed in non-major ΔPWCT subgroup. Major ΔPWCT did not correlate with PWA size, LVA, or AF CL.

conclusionPWCT may represent a novel functional biomarker of LAPW remodeling, independent of structural changes, potentially identifying patients who may benefit from targeted LAPW ablation. Further studies are needed to validate PWCT as a guide for personalized AF ablation.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationAtrial Function, LeftAtrial RemodelingHeart AtriaAction PotentialsAgedCatheter AblationElectrophysiologic Techniques, CardiacFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPredictive Value of TestsTime Factorsatrial fibrillationfunctional left atrial remodelingposterior wall isolation

Identifiers

PMID41882991
PMCPMC13182214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.