ArticleAmerican journal of industrial medicine2026
An Evaluation of Mortality Rates and Their Determinants in a Cohort of Former Asbestos Miners in South Africa.
Article in American journal of industrial medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA causal association between occupational asbestos exposure and lung disease, including pneumoconiosis and mesothelioma, is well established. Elevated mortality among former asbestos miners is expected. However, large-scale South African studies examining all-cause mortality in this population are lacking. We assessed all-cause mortality among former asbestos miners recorded in the Asbestos and Kgalagadi Relief Trusts' Inyosi database.
methodsAll-cause standard mortality ratios (SMRs) and crude mortality rates (CMRs) were calculated for 11,343 ex-miners. Mortality predictors were modeled using Cox regression analysis, and mortality trends were assessed by examining annual all-cause CMRs and SMRs over the 20-year study period.
resultsThe cohort's all-cause mortality exceeded that of the general population by 4% (SMR = 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01-1.07), with excess mortality confined to women (SMR = 1.17; 95% CI: 1.09-1.25). Increasing ILO radiographic profusion category strongly predicted mortality, with adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) ranging from 1.13 (95% CI: 1.05-1.23) to 2.42 (95% CI: 1.58-3.71). Severely reduced lung function was also associated with increased risk, including forced expiratory volume in 1 s and forced vital capacity z-scores below -3.0 (aHR = 1.60; 95% CI: 1.41-1.81 and aHR = 1.26; 95% CI: 1.12-1.42, respectively). Additional predictors included body mass index less than 18.5 kg/m² (aHR = 1.46; 95% CI: 1.36-1.58) and previous smoking (aHR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.35-1.53). SMRs declined over time.
conclusionRadiological and spirometric indicators were key predictors of mortality. These findings support risk stratification and targeted interventions, particularly early management of respiratory complications and smoking cessation, to reduce mortality. The excess female mortality highlights the occupational hazards of aboveground asbestos activities, gender‑specific work practices, and insufficient control measures in this setting. Although standardized mortality was only modestly elevated, interpretation was limited by incomplete data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.