ReviewCancer medicine2026
Umbrella Reviews Conducted in an Oncology Healthcare Context Focusing on Supportive Care, Systems, and Models of Care: A Review of Umbrella Reviews.
Review in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsHealthcare providers need access to evidence-based knowledge to deliver interventions effectively within clinical settings. This paper aims to provide an overview of umbrella reviews (URs) conducted in an oncology healthcare context. In this review, the oncology healthcare context relates to focusing on care delivery systems, supportive care, supportive care needs, and supportive care interventions, systems, and models of care for cancer survivorship care and support.
methodsThis overview followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR) statement. The literature search was performed in seven databases including PubMed, CINAHL, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycInfo, SocINDEX with Full Text, Embase, and Cochrane Database from 2012 to 2023. The search terms and eligibility criteria were organized around the PCC framework. The JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Synthesis was used for quality assessment.
resultsSeventy-six umbrella reviews were included in this review. Only four reviews demonstrated low quality. Tables and bubble maps helped to outline the key findings of included URs. Recommendations to aid future studies and reviews were summarized into five overarching themes.
conclusionsIn conclusion, we outlined the range and gaps in topics covered, as well as the key features of umbrella reviews examining oncological supportive care systems and models of care over the past decade. Future research should address the multidimensional nature and complexity of clinical implementation and methodological concerns; consider underrepresented populations and be more targeted to inform policy development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.