ReviewPerioperative medicine (London, England)2026
Perioperative virtual reality and neuropsychiatric outcomes: a scoping review.
Review in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgical procedures in older populations carry significant risks, including increased perioperative complications such as anxiety and delirium, which adversely affect outcomes and patient satisfaction. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and methods of virtual reality (VR) interventions in reducing perioperative anxiety and delirium in a scoping review.
methodsSearches were performed in Embase and PubMed from 2020 to 2025 for studies involving VR in adult surgical patients, focusing on anxiety, pain, and delirium outcomes.
resultsTwenty-three studies encompassing 2,227 patients were included, predominantly randomized controlled trials from various countries. No study directly evaluated VR's effect on delirium, but several showed VR's potential in reducing perioperative anxiety and pain, with mixed efficacy results. VR interventions varied in content, technological sophistication, frequency, and duration. Quality assessment indicated limitations due to unblinded designs.
conclusionsVR shows promise in reducing perioperative anxiety, with potential implications for delirium prevention. However, the effectiveness varies, and further research is needed to refine VR interventions and explore their role in preventing delirium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.