Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41882780›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2026

Frailty and long-term mortality in cardiogenic shock: a binational multicentre cohort study.

Ryan Ruiyang Ling, Shir Lynn Lim, David M Kaye, Oliver Lim, Christopher Jer Wei Low, Graeme MacLaren, Daniel I McIsaac, Kiran Shekar, Ryo Ueno, David Pilcher and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ryan Ruiyang LingYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore. ryan.ling@u.nus.edu.
Shir Lynn LimYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore. shir.lynn.lim@nus.edu.sg.
David M KayeThe Department of Cardiology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Oliver LimChangi General Hospital, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore.
Christopher Jer Wei LowSengkang General Hospital, Singapore Health Services, SingaporeSingapore, Singapore.
Graeme MacLarenYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Daniel I McIsaacDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Kiran ShekarAdult Intensive Care Services, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Ryo UenoAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
David PilcherAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Kollengode RamanathanYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Ashwin SubramaniamAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrailty is increasingly recognised as a prognostic marker in cardiovascular disease, but its role in cardiogenic shock is less defined.

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study across 188 intensive care units (ICUs), we analysed data from the Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database on adults (≥ 16 years) with admitted with cardiogenic shock between 2017–2023, and a documented Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). The primary outcome was death at up to four years using an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, which we also assessed using a time-varying model. We conducted subgroup analyses based on age, sex, aetiology of cardiogenic shock, and a landmark survival analysis at ICU discharge.

resultsWe included 71,359 patients (median age 68.6 years, 70.0% males); 11,087 had frailty. Frailty was associated with a higher hazard of death (adjusted Hazard ratio [aHR]: 2.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.05–2.51) in a non-linear incremental fashion; this was consistent across sensitivity analyses. Time-varying analysis found that frailty demonstrated the highest hazard for death at approximately six months post-ICU admission (HR: 3.71, 95%-CI: 3.29–4.18). Frailty was more strongly associated with death in patients with ischaemic than non-ischaemic cardiogenic shock, and in males more than females. Frailty was also associated with death in a landmark survival analysis at ICU discharge (aHR: 3.13, 95%-CI: 2.82–3.48).

conclusionsFrailty is associated with mortality beyond ICU discharge in cardiogenic shock in a non-linear, stepwise fashion. These findings support the integration of frailty assessment into ICU risk stratification and post-discharge care planning.

Indexed as

FrailtyShock, CardiogenicAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesANZICSCardiogenic shockCFSClinical Frailty ScaleFrailtySurvival

Identifiers

PMID41882780
PMCPMC13137703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.