ArticleMicrobiome2026
Environmental microbiota transfer from forest soil into urban homes: a proof-of-principle study.
Article in Microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring and defining concepts of microbiome stewardship for the indoor built environment.Sustainable microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUrban lifestyles are characterized by reduced encounters of environmental microbe stimuli that activate immunoregulatory pathways. This has been linked to an increased risk of inflammatory diseases, asthma, and allergies. A potential preventative solution is to modify indoor microbial exposures toward health-promoting interactions. Here, we test the feasibility of environmental microbiota transfers into urban homes and quantify the spatiotemporal impact on the built environment microbiota.
methodsHouse dust microbiota of six Finnish homes was monitored over a 20-week period by collecting settled dust from infant (IBZs) and adult breathing zones (ABZs) and floor dust from different home locations. Microbiota in dust samples was characterized using qPCR and amplicon sequencing of the bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene and fungal ITS1 region. Microbiota transfers were performed with repeated seeding of forest soil onto rugs placed in the home entryway.
resultsWe observed significant, post-intervention increases in the relative abundances of forest soil bacteria in house dust. The magnitude of effect was influenced by building characteristics, spatiotemporal dynamics, and occupant dynamics and was greatest in a home with comparably little additional microbial influx-a home with no pets, low occupancy, and mechanical ventilation. The most pronounced effect was observed in settled dust close to the soil-seeded rugs at IBZ, within the first 2 weeks after each seeding event, though the soil-associated bacterial signal also extended spatially into the living areas of the homes. Increases in bacterial diversity and an asthma protective microbiota index, as well as decreases in the proportion of human-sourced bacteria, were also observed, but only in airborne dust close to the soil-seeded rug. Effects on fungal microbiota or on the bacterial and fungal loads in house dust were inconsistent.
conclusionsWe demonstrate that a simple soil-to-rug intervention can modify the bacterial microbiota in airborne particulate matter in residential homes. The introduction of specific environmental soil microbes was most pronounced closest to the source, which is relevant when targeting infant inhalation exposure. While this approach is promising, specifically in highly urbanized settings, dosage and composition of environmental microbiota additions to reach health benefits require further study. Video Abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.