ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Estimation of future occurrence of hemoglobin-A1c elevation with and without differential privacy.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrivacy protection is crucial for legal compliance and ethical practices, particularly in medical data sharing. Maintaining trust is essential for effective healthcare delivery, preventing discrimination, and protecting patient information. Glycated hemoglobin is an essential parameter for diagnosing diabetes, and its analysis is sometimes necessary for decision-making. Preventing the leakage of this valuable information is a crucial consideration.
methodsLocal differential privacy (LDP) is one of the best methods to address this problem. In this study, we applied four LDP algorithms (Logistic regression, tree-based methods, and Gaussian naïve Bayes) to determine an appropriate degree of privacy budget for data perturbation demands. We also applied two dimensionality reduction techniques, principal component analysis and discriminant component analysis (DCA), with Gaussian naïve Bayes to observe their effects on the results. Theoretically, a higher value of e enhances usefulness but decreases privacy protection.
resultsThe logistic regression model achieved an accuracy of > 70% for the smallest e values, outperforming the other algorithms. In the dimensionality reduction techniques, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of DCA was > 80% with LDP when the value of 𝜀 was < 0.1.
conclusionsThis study provides important insights into data privacy for researchers, practitioners, and policy makers, particularly those who handle sensitive medical data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.