ArticleBMC health services research2026
Bridging organizational boundaries in complex care pathways: lessons from a Lean and Safety Management approach.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Barriers to Lean & Safety Management Implementation in Primary Care Settings: Insights from an Unsuccessful Case.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundComplex care processes that span hospital and community settings represent a growing organizational challenge for healthcare systems, particularly in the management of chronic conditions. These pathways involve interdependent activities distributed across multiple facilities, professional groups, and levels of care, increasing the risk of fragmentation, inefficiency, and patient harm. While Lean Healthcare (LH) has been widely adopted to improve healthcare performance, its application has largely remained confined to single hospital units, with limited attention to care integration and patient safety. Evidence on how to design and implement improvement initiatives across hospital-community interfaces remains scarce.
methodsThis study developed, tested, and refined an integrated Lean and Safety Management (L&SM) methodology by combining LH with Clinical Risk Management to proactively address both waste and risk throughout the care process. The methodology was designed and empirically validated through three iterative Action Research cycles conducted in a real-world healthcare setting involving complex chronic care pathways bridging hospital and community services. Data were collected through direct observation, document analysis, and stakeholder engagement, and analyzed iteratively across cycles to identify key activities, tools, barriers, and enablers of implementation.
resultsThe proposed L&SM methodology demonstrated its applicability and effectiveness in improving the performance of complex care processes across organizational boundaries. The findings reveal key activities, tools, barriers, and enablers for implementing L&SM across hospital-community interfaces, while also uncovering cultural and organizational dynamics that shape improvement efforts. Beyond health care, these results shed light on how organizations operating in complex, high-stakes environments can jointly pursue efficiency and patient safety while fostering a culture of continuous improvement.
conclusionsThis study addresses a significant gap in the health services research literature by extending L&SM knowledge beyond hospital boundaries, addressing gaps in current literature. The research provides a structured, step-by-step methodology for implementing L&SM in complex care processes, tackling the managerial and organizational complexities of hospital-community integration, pursuing multi-dimensional performance improvement and aligning with global health priorities, thus offering an actionable guidance for healthcare managers and practitioners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.