Trial reportBMC oral health2026
Nylon clip wear and patient satisfaction in implant-retained mandibular overdenture using PEEK bar versus metal bar: a one-year randomized clinical study.
Trial report in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06909435 (Nylon Clip Wear and Patient Perception in Implant Retained Mandibular Overdenture Using PEEK Versus Metal Bar), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Nylon Clip Wear and Patient Perception in Implant Retained Mandibular Overdenture Using PEEK Versus Metal Bar :One Year Randomized Clinical Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
statement of problemNylon clip wear affects the retention of implant-retained overdenture. PURPOSE: The purpose of the present investigation was to determine the wear of nylon clips and patient satisfaction with either a cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) metal bar or a milled polyether ether ketone (PEEK) bar in mandibular dentures supported by two implant-retained mandibular overdentures over a one-year clinical study. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty edentulous patients were randomly divided into two groups ten patients in each group. Group I (Co-Cr metal bar with nylon clip) and Group II (PEEK bar with nylon clip). In both groups, two implants were placed in the canine–premolar region using a delayed loading protocol. The primary outcome was Nylon clip wear, it was evaluated using volumetric change and surface roughness assessment at insertion, three months, six months, nine months, and one year. Patient satisfaction was evaluated at six months and one year using a visual analog scale (VAS). Data were collected and statistically analyzed to compare the final outcomes between the two groups.
resultsThe metal group showed significantly higher roughness and volumetric changes with volumetric changes reached 7.49 μm ± 0.47 after 12 months (P=.0001) compared to the PEEK group that reached 7.21 μm ± 0.43 with no difference was found between them at 12 months (P = .188). Patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the PEEK group, regarding retention, stability, comfort, and speaking at both 6 months and 1 year (P=.04).
conclusionsNylon clips showed clinically acceptable wear performance with both PEEK and metal bars after 1 year, and the PEEK bar demonstrated superior surface properties and patient satisfaction, especially in the first 6 months of the study.
trial registrationThe study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the faculty of dentistry, Cairo University (No 94/23) and registered in the Clinical Trials.gov (NCT06909435). Trial Registration date is 27-03-2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.