ArticleBMC nephrology2026
Automated CT segmentation of kidneys successfully quantifies changes in total kidney volume in ICU patients, a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKidney function is associated with kidney volume. This study aims to explore automated segmentation for measuring total kidney volume (TKV) and to analyse the association between (changes in) TKV and acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence and/or severity in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients.
methodsPatients were included in this retrospective pilot cohort study when at least two abdominal Computed Tomography (CT) scans were performed during ICU admission. If available, CT scans made before the ICU admission were included as a baseline scan. TKV was measured by automated segmentation of both kidneys using Data Analysis Facilitation Suite (DAFS, Voronoi Analytics Incorporated). All segmentations were visually checked and manually adjusted when necessary. ΔTKV was calculated between baseline CT and CT1 (ΔTKVCT1–baseline) and CT1 and CT2 (ΔTKVCT2–CT1). Primary outcomes were differences in kidney volume before and after manual correction and AKI incidence and severity, per the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines, on the day of scanning.
resultsTwenty-six patients were included, of whom eighteen developed AKI during ICU admission. Analysis showed no significant differences in volumes before and after manual correction of the automated segmentations. TKV was not associated with AKI incidence or severity. Longitudinal intraindividual changes in TKV were observed. Median ΔTKVCT1–baseline was statistically significantly different for AKI versus non-AKI patients (−22 cm3 (−49–9) versus 42 cm3 (23–43), p = 0.03) and for different KDIGO stages.
conclusionThis study demonstrates the possibility of measuring TKV on CT in ICU patients using automated segmentation. Longitudinal intraindividual changes in TKV were observed, however, no clear association between TKV and AKI was found. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.