ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Machine learning-based prediction of rotator cuff tears using anatomical parameters: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Development and validation of a model to predict full thickness rotator cuff tear.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo apply machine learning to improve risk assessment for rotator cuff tears by developing an integrated predictive model that combines acromial morphology (structural factors) and patient characteristics (systemic factors).
methodsA total of 342 patients who underwent shoulder radiography and MRI between 2023 and 2025 were included (180 tears, 162 intact). Demographic and radiographic parameters—including the novel acromial angle (NAA), critical shoulder angle, acromion index (AI), and acromial tilt—were collected. Six machine learning classifiers (logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, and XGBoost) were trained using 10-fold cross-validation after LASSO-based feature selection. Performance was evaluated on a hold-out test set using area under the curve (AUC) and secondary metrics. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were used to interpret feature contributions in the best model.
resultsThe tear group was older and showed a significantly smaller NAA (142.8° vs. 147.4°) and higher AI (0.80 vs. 0.77) than the intact group (P < 0.001). Diabetes was more common and BMI lower among patients with tears (P < 0.01). XGBoost achieved the best performance (AUC 0.87 in training, 0.74 in testing), with higher balanced accuracy and F1-score than other classifiers. SHAP analysis indicated that NAA, age, AI, and dominant-arm involvement were the strongest predictors.
conclusionsA machine-learning model integrating clinical and acromial morphological factors can effectively predict rotator cuff tear risk. The novel acromial angle is a key determinant. This interpretable model may support early identification of high-risk individuals and inform preventive strategies, but prospective validation is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.