ArticleBMC public health2026
Multi-level experiences of HIV-related stigma among people living with HIV: an institution-based qualitative study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStigma remains a pervasive barrier to the health and well-being of people living with HIV (PLHIV), affecting access to treatment and care. In Nepal, discriminatory attitudes and behaviors persist across all levels, often resulting in mental distress, social isolation, and delayed care-seeking. Guided by the Intersectional Stigma Framework, this study explored how lived HIV -related stigma operates across individual, interpersonal, community, and structural levels, and how existing social and institutional mechanisms shape the lived experiences of PLHIV.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted among 26 people living with HIV, who had been receiving antiretroviral therapy services for at least six months at Sukraraj Tropical and Infectious Disease Hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal. Participants were selected purposively. In-depth interviews were conducted using semi-structured guidelines informed by the intersectional stigma framework. Data were analyzed using R software for qualitative data analysis, and thematic analysis was employed to identify and interpret key themes.
resultsParticipants reported internalized stigma characterized by shame, guilt, and psychological distress following diagnosis, often accompanied by secrecy, and self-isolation. Over time, social support and self-acceptance contributed to improved mental health and adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART). At the interpersonal level, disclosure was limited due to fear of rejection, with some reporting abandonment by family. Community-level stigma manifested as discrimination in public settings, with some individuals facing housing displacement and public shaming. Structural stigma was reflected in healthcare facilities through breaches of confidentiality and discriminatory practices. While the provision of free ART and insurance was well-received, concerns persisted about the sustainability of these programs over time.
conclusionHIV-related stigma in Nepal operates through interconnected psychological, social, and institutional mechanisms that influence disclosure, treatment engagement, and social participation among PLHIV. Addressing stigma requires multi-level interventions, including strengthened confidentiality practices in healthcare, expanded psychosocial support, community education, and sustained policy commitment to ensure equitable and stigma-free HIV services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.