ArticleBMC gastroenterology2026
Interpretable stacking model integrating intra-/peritumoral CT-radiomics and serum biomarkers for predicting microvascular invasion in HCC: a dual-center retrospective study.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable model using serum biomarkers and intra-/peri-aneurysmal CTA radiomics for discriminating ruptured from unruptured intracranial aneurysms: an external validation retrospective study.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- CT-derived topological intratumoral heterogeneity predicts major pathological response to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: a two-center study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo establish an interpretable stacking model integrating intratumoral and peritumoral multi-phase CT radiomics with serum biomarkers for predicting microvascular invasion (MVI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 219 HCC patients. 151 HCC patients from Center 1 were randomly divided into a training set (N = 105) and a test set (N = 46). 68 HCC patients from Center 2 were classified as an external validation set. Radiomics features were extracted from primary lesion and its surrounding 5 mm region on enhanced CT, and the total Stacking radiomics score (TOTALSRads) was constructed. The nutritional immune inflammation score (NIIs) was derived from serum biomarkers. Four machine learning classifiers were employed to develop models, and the optimal model (SLMXG) was integrated using several different fusion strategies. The model’s evaluation used the area under the curve (AUC), confidence interval (CI), and decision curve analysis (DCA). Model interpretability was assessed using SHAP analysis and correlation analyses.
resultsSLMXG achieved the best AUC of 0.9577 in the training set, and was well verified in test set (AUC: 0.8611[95%CI 0.7493–0.9729]) and external validation set (AUC: 0.8629[95%CI 0.7730–0.9528]) with good calibration. In external validation set, SLMXG exhibited an accuracy of 0.8088, precision of 0.8529, F1 score of 0.8169, and Brier score of 0.1545, showing favorable clinical net benefit with a threshold probability range of 20%‒85%. Correlation analyses indicated good agreement among intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics, TOTALSRads, and NIIs (P < 0.001). SHAP analyses highlighted that peritumoral radiomics and serum biomarkers contributed powerful enhancing roles for SLMXG, with Venous_phase_intra-peritumoral 0.5 cm radiomics and Xgboost contributing the most.
conclusionsThe SLMXG, which integrates different learning fusion strategies with serum biomarkers and intratumoral and peritumoral multi-phase CT radiomics, highlights good discriminative performance for predicting MVI in HCC, and may promote individualized therapeutic planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.