ArticlePrenatal diagnosis2026
Prenatal Tympanic Ring Anomaly Without Microtia: A Subtle Clue Toward Severe Early-Onset Monogenic Disorders.
Article in Prenatal diagnosis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the genetic etiologies and clinical significance of fetal tympanic ring abnormalities detected during second-trimester ultrasound in the absence of microtia.
methodBetween November 2019 and June 2024, we examined the fetal tympanic rings of 10,277 unselected pregnant women during the 20-22 weeks of morphology ultrasound. Fetal cases with abnormal tympanic rings, without microtia, underwent amniocentesis for genetic investigation, including chromosome microarray analysis and trio genome sequencing (30×).
resultsFive fetuses (0.05%, 5/10,277) with abnormal tympanic rings in the absence of microtia were identified in this cohort, including three unilaterally (2 right, 1 left) and two bilaterally affected cases. Four fetuses had no other obvious structural abnormalities. One had an isolated unilateral hypoplastic tympanic ring with negative genetic findings and was postnatally found to have conductive hearing loss. The remaining four fetuses were diagnosed with severe early-onset genetic disorders (80%), including KBG syndrome, Noonan syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and Cornelia de Lange syndrome. All these four pregnancies were terminated.
conclusionUltrasound evaluation of fetal tympanic ring abnormalities is feasible during the second trimester. Fetal tympanic ring anomalies even occurring with minor ultrasound markers may represent a significant indication for a comprehensive genetic assessment. More studies are needed to establish how tympanic ring anomalies should be integrated into routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.