ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2026
Drug-coated balloon angioplasty for coronary and peripheral artery disease: latest evidence and clinical indications.
Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Severe Renal Colic as a Trigger of Coronary Thrombosis on Plaque Erosion.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are devices used for the treatment of both coronary artery disease (CAD) and peripheral artery disease (PAD). One of the hypothesized advantages of DCB angioplasty over stent implantation is that DCB angioplasty does not result in the presence of a permanent metallic scaffold in the vessel wall. However, DCB angioplasty also has some important limitations, such as a potentially lower efficacy compared with other modalities; therefore, the role of DCBs in the treatment of CAD and PAD is not fully defined. Over the past 20 years, many clinical trials have been performed to investigate the use of these devices for a variety of indications. In this Review, we describe the device design and mechanism of action of DCBs and discuss important procedural considerations for successful DCB use. We summarize the scientific and clinical evidence for DCB angioplasty in CAD and PAD. In addition, we highlight the recommendations for DCB use in clinical practice guidelines and provide perspectives on the potential future role that DCB angioplasty might have in the treatment of CAD and PAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41882336What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.