Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41882314›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026

WiseMind: a knowledge-guided multi-agent framework for accurate and empathetic psychiatric diagnosis.

Yuqi Wu, Guangya Wan, Jingjing Li, Shengming Zhao, Lingfeng Ma, Tianyi Ye, Mike Zhang, Ion Pop, Yanbo Zhang, Jie Chen

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yuqi Wu *College of Biomedical Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Guangya Wan *School of Data Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Jingjing LiMcIntire School of Commerce, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. jingjing.li@virginia.edu.
Shengming ZhaoCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Lingfeng MaCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Tianyi YeCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Mike ZhangDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Ion PopDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Yanbo ZhangDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. yanbo9@ualberta.ca.
Jie ChenCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. jc65@ualberta.ca.

Funding

China Scholarship Council 202308180002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) offer promising opportunities to support mental healthcare workflows, yet they often lack the structured clinical reasoning needed for reliable diagnosis and may struggle to provide the emotionally attuned communication essential for patient trust. Here, we introduce WiseMind, a novel multi-agent framework inspired by the theory of Dialectical Behavior Therapy designed to facilitate psychiatric assessment. By integrating a "Reasonable Mind" Agent for evidence-based logic and an "Emotional Mind" Agent for empathetic communication, WiseMind effectively bridges the gap between instrumental accuracy and humanistic care. Our framework utilizes a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5)-guided Structured Knowledge Graph to steer diagnostic inquiries, significantly reducing hallucinations compared to standard prompting methods. Using a combination of virtual standard patients, simulated interactions, and real human interaction datasets, we evaluate WiseMind across three common psychiatric conditions. WiseMind outperforms state-of-the-art LLM methods in both identifying critical diagnostic nodes and establishing accurate differential diagnoses. Across 1206 simulated conversations and 180 real user sessions, the system achieves 85.6% top-1 diagnostic accuracy, approaching reported diagnostic performance ranges of board-certified psychiatrists and surpassing knowledge-enhanced single-agent baselines by 15-54 percentage points. Expert review by psychiatrists further validates that WiseMind generates responses that are not only clinically sound but also psychologically supportive, demonstrating the feasibility of empathetic, reliable AI agents to conduct psychiatric assessments under appropriate human oversight.

Identifiers

PMID41882314
PMCPMC13408596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.