ReviewCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026
Emotion detection unveiled: A cognitive-computational synthesis of physiological models, machine learning, and datasets.
Review in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This comprehensive survey synthesizes state-of-the-art advancements in emotion recognition based on physiological signals, specifically focusing on the paradigm shift occurring between 2021 and 2025. Crucially, we move beyond a technical review by establishing a novel Cognitive-Computational Synthesis Framework (CCSF). This framework explicitly maps multimodal physiological manifestations (e.g., electroencephalogram (EEG), electrocardiogram (ECG), and galvanic skin response (GSR)) to underlying cognitive processes, such as attentional allocation, arousal regulation, and perceptual bias, providing a theoretical foundation for explainable AI (XAI) in affective computing. We meticulously examine the transition from traditional machine learning to advanced deep learning architectures, highlighting how recent innovations in Transformers, self-supervised learning, and diffusion models have shattered previous performance plateaus. While earlier dimensional models were often limited to 70-75% accuracy, this survey details how modern architectures now achieve benchmarks exceeding 95% on seminal datasets like SEED and DREAMER. Furthermore, the survey provides a rigorous analysis of 40 key studies (identified via PRISMA protocols), evaluating them based on their validation strategies, cross-subject generalizability, and adversarial robustness. By bridging the gap between raw physiological data and cognitive theory, this work offers a strategic roadmap for the next generation of robust, interpretable, and real-time emotion recognition systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41882308What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.