ArticleCommunications psychology2026
Perceptual and conceptual influences on memory judgments.
Article in Communications psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Memory representations contain a rich array of features, including perceptual and conceptual features of encoded stimuli. While prior research demonstrates that both feature types are independently represented in memory, available evidence suggests that recognition decisions (i.e., identifying one image as previously seen) depend primarily on conceptual features. However, memory judgments are a culmination of several processing stages: evidence accumulation, recognition decisions and subjective evaluations about memory quality. Whether perceptual and conceptual representations influence stages beyond recognition decisions, and whether these representations interact during these stages, remains untested. To address these questions, we conducted a series of experiments in which subjects performed forced-choice memory tests. In these tests, subjects encoded several images (e.g., the picture of a dog) and later had to discriminate between the encoded images and similar lures (e.g., the picture of a similar dog). Crucially, we employed computational models of vision to independently quantify the perceptual and conceptual similarity between the encoded images and their lures. Experiment 1 (N = 140) revealed that both perceptual and conceptual similarity impaired evidence accumulation, though only conceptual similarity decreased recognition accuracy. Experiments 2 (N = 254) and 3 (N = 315) revealed a similar effect, with conceptual similarity decreasing recognition accuracy. However, by directly testing interactions between both types of features, our results showed that when perceptual similarity between targets and lures was high, the detrimental effect of conceptual similarity on recognition accuracy was diminished -a reduction that was associated with participants increased reliance on more detailed-based retrieval strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.