ArticleScientific reports2026
A comparative evaluation of gradient-based optimization algorithms for short-term load forecasting using deep residual networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Short-Term Load Forecasting (STLF) is essential for the reliable and economic operation of modern power systems. Deep Residual Networks (DRNs) have emerged as an effective framework for STLF due to their ability to model nonlinear and multi-scale load patterns. Although numerous DRN-based extensions have been proposed through architectural refinement and feature enhancement, the role of gradient-based optimization algorithms in DRN-based STLF has received limited systematic investigation. Most existing studies rely on the Adaptive Moment Estimation (Adam) algorithm as the default optimization strategy, without comprehensively examining alternative gradient-based optimizers. To address this gap, this study conducts a hypothesis-driven comparative evaluation of representative gradient-based optimization algorithms within a unified DRN-based STLF framework across both temperate (ISO-NE) and tropical (MyPJ) climatic conditions. Both the original DRN, which primarily incorporates temperature as the meteorological input, and its enhanced variant, the Principal Component Analysis–Deep Residual Network (PCA-DRN), which integrates multiple weather variables through PCA, are investigated using real-world electricity load datasets. Forecasting performance is evaluated using multiple metrics, with Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) as the primary criterion, and statistical significance is assessed through a nonparametric bootstrap resampling procedure. The results demonstrate that optimizer selection significantly influences training stability and forecasting accuracy. AMSGrad achieves the most consistent performance within the original DRN across climatic conditions, whereas under PCA-based feature representation the relative advantage shifts, indicating that meteorological feature compression reshapes the optimization landscape. Overall, the findings highlight the importance of systematic optimizer evaluation and feature-representation strategies for enhancing the reliability and stability of DRN-based STLF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.