ArticleScientific reports2026
Design and immunogenicity evaluation of pan-recombinant vaccines based on the consensus sequence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 spike protein.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although multivalent vaccines are being developed to address the rapid mutations of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), universal vaccines are needed to protect against evolving variants and seasonal epidemics. We designed and evaluated the efficacy of three universal SARS-CoV-2 recombinant vaccine candidates based on a consensus sequence of spike protein from multiple variants. The candidates were designed with specific substitutions, including S-GSAS/6P and S-R/x2, to enhance immunogenicity by stabilizing the prefusion spike-protein conformation. Using murine models, we assessed humoral and cellular immune responses, protective efficacy, and viral load reduction following immunization and challenge with the ancestral and XBB1.5 strains. The pan-COVID-19 vaccine candidates stimulated the production of cytokines, specifically interferon-γ and interleukin-2, and induced neutralizing antibodies targeting the ancestral, Delta, and Omicron variants. Vaccination reduced viral replication rates in pulmonary tissues of mice infected with the ancestral and XBB1.5 variants; however, their protective efficacy varied among formulations. Candidates containing the S2 subunit elicited better immune responses and protective effects than those containing solely the S1 subunit, consistent with published evidence supporting the cross-reactivity of the S2 region. The proposed vaccine candidates represent promising broad-spectrum protective agents against rapidly mutating SARS-CoV-2 variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.