ArticleBiodegradation2026
Bioremediation of anthraquinone dye reactive blue 19 by halo-acido-alkaliphilic bacterial consortia.
Article in Biodegradation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Whole-genome sequence data ofData in brief · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Water pollution caused by dyes is a global problem. This study examines the effect of four recently created bacterial consortia on bioremediation of Reactive Blue 19 (RB 19, a recalcitrant, mutagenic, and carcinogenic anthraquinone dye) in a range of environmental and nutritional circumstances. Color reductions were significantly (P < 0.001) influenced by both the bacterial consortia and the factors tested. Under optimal conditions (Salt-optimized broth with 2% glycerol, 0.5% yeast extract, 2.5% NaCl, 75 mg/L dye, pH 8, 28 °C, 72 h incubation, and microaerophilic), 94.0, 96.7, 97.9, and 99.7% decolorization achieved by C1 (Pseudomonas fluorescens ENSG304, Klebsiella pneumoniae ENSG303, Acinetobacter lwoffii ENSG302, and Vitreoscilla sp. ENSG301), C2 (Enterobacter asburiae ENSD102, E. ludwigii ENSH201, and Escherichia coli ENSD101), C3 (ENSD102, ENSG301, and Bacillus thuringiensis ENSW401), and C4 (ENSD101, ENSH201, and ENSW401), respectively. Out of all consortia, C4 performed the best across all conditions, followed by C3. Under favorable conditions, these consortia generated high amounts of lignin peroxidase, laccase, and NADH-DCIP reductase, while enzyme expression was significantly repressed under unfavorable conditions. A remarkable amount of chemical oxygen demand (82.9 to 89.4%) and total organic carbon (66.4 to 71.6%) was decreased by inoculation of these consortia. The biodegradation of RB 19 was validated by Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) and UV-Vis spectrum studies. The biodegraded compounds did not inhibit plant and microbial growth, suggesting detoxification. These findings suggest that the studied consortia, particularly C4, exhibit promising potential for RB 19 decolorization under the tested conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41882241What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.