ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Multidimensional nomogram for prediction of cardiovascular disease risk in cancer survivors.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo identify factors associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) among cancer survivors using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database, and to construct and validate a clinical model to assess the probability of CVD risk among these patients.
methodsA total of 1766 cancer survivors from the 2011-2018 NHANES database were included. Univariate analysis was used to screen for differential variables, and the XGBoost model was used to assess the importance of variables. A nomogram prediction model was constructed based on multivariate logistic regression and evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analyses.
resultsOn univariate analysis, age, marital status, family income poverty index ratio, total cholesterol, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, depression degree, sedentary time, and sleep time were significantly associated with CVD risk (all P < 0.05). The XGBoost model identified age, marital status, total cholesterol, hypertension, diabetes, and depression degree as factors independently associated with CVD. Multivariate analysis showed that increased age, divorced or cohabitation status, hypertension, and moderately severe or severe depression were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of CVD, whereas elevated total cholesterol was associated with a likelihood risk. The area under the ROC curve of the nomogram model for assessing CVD was 0.734. The calibration curve showed high consistency between the predicted and actual risks, and decision curve analysis confirmed that the model had a net clinical benefit over a wide range of thresholds. Due to the cross-sectional design, no causal inferences can be drawn from this study.
conclusionThis study constructed a CVD risk prediction model for cancer survivors, suggesting the utility of integrating psychosocial variables with traditional biomedical indicators for risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41882235What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.