ArticleScientific reports2026
Adaptive fuzzy sliding mode control applied to inverted pendulum.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adaptive super-twisting sliding mode control for robust tracking of wearable PAM-driven robotic manipulator.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Adaptive constraint-following control for maintenance robotic manipulator with uncertainties.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The inverted pendulum on a cart represents a classical benchmark of underactuated nonlinear systems characterized by strong coupling, inherent instability, and sensitivity to uncertainties. This paper proposes an Adaptive Fuzzy Sliding Mode Controller (AFSMC) that integrates fuzzy inference with sliding mode principles to simultaneously preserve robustness and eliminate chattering effects. A hierarchical sliding surface is first formulated to coordinate cart position and pendulum angle stabilization using a single control input. While conventional SMC provides strong robustness against external disturbances, it suffers from severe chattering and excessive control effort. FSMC replaces the discontinuous switching action with a fuzzy inference mechanism, producing a smoother control signal, but it shows limited robustness under significant parametric uncertainties. To overcome this limitation, an adaptive fuzzy mechanism is introduced to tune the sliding gain online based on the pendulum error dynamics, increasing robustness during large deviations and reducing control activity near equilibrium. The controllers are evaluated under nominal conditions, impulse disturbances, and parameter variations. Simulation results demonstrate that AFSMC achieves smooth control, strong robustness, and the lowest control norm among all methods, providing an effective balance between robustness, chattering elimination, and energy-efficient control for underactuated nonlinear systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.