ArticleScientific reports2026
Grip strength indicators and successful aging among middle-aged and older adults: evidence from the CHARLS cohort.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Successful aging is a multidimensional core concept encompassing physical, psychological, and social adaptability. Its non-achievement not only significantly reduces the quality of life of older adults but also increases the care and economic burden on families and society. This study aimed to systematically explore the association between multidimensional grip strength indicators and successful aging among middle-aged and older adults in China, and to clarify the strength of association of different indicators. Using prospective cohort data from four waves (2011-2018) of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), successful aging was defined based on the internationally accepted five-dimensional Rowe-Kahn criteria. Multivariate logistic regression models and Latent Class Growth Model (LCGM) were used to analyze the associations of successful aging with baseline grip strength, three-time average grip strength, longitudinal grip strength variability indicators, and long-term grip strength trajectories, respectively. Results showed that among 1,892 participants, 52 (2.76%) achieved successful aging during follow-up. Three-time average grip strength was significantly and robustly positively associated with successful aging - after full covariate adjustment, each 1-unit increase was associated with a 7.8% higher probability of achieving successful aging (OR = 1.078, 95% CI: 1.023-1.137, P = 0.005), and its model discriminative power was significantly superior to single baseline grip strength measurement. Variability Independent of the Mean (VIM) was significantly negatively associated with successful aging - after full covariate adjustment, each 1-unit increase was associated with a 35.2% lower probability of achieving successful aging (OR = 0.648, 95% CI: 0.417-0.962, P = 0.042). Additionally, compared with the high-baseline slight decline trajectory, middle-aged and older adults with the moderate-baseline gentle decline trajectory had a 61% significantly lower probability of achieving successful aging (OR = 0.390, 95% CI: 0.161-0.944, P = 0.035). These findings indicate that multidimensional grip strength indicators are significantly associated with successful aging among middle-aged and older adults in China, with three-time average grip strength and VIM showing the strongest associations. The results can provide evidence-based reference for health risk stratification in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.