ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Simultaneous combined endonasal and transcranial surgery for large skull base tumors invading multiple regions: combination variations, pros and cons, and surgical results.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Simultaneous combined endonasal and transcranial surgery (SCENaTCS) is an accepted treatment option for giant pituitary tumors to prevent postoperative intratumoral hemorrhage from residual tumors. For various skull base pathologies, especially tumors invading multiple regions, SCENaTCS may be applicable, with advantages equal to or greater than those of staged surgeries using either the same or a different surgical approach. Twenty-six consecutive SCENaTCS procedures for 24 patients with highly complex skull base tumors were classified into following four types on anatomical basis: Type 1 (n = 8): giant pituitary tumors with a marked suprasellar component; Type 2 (n = 10): midline parasellar tumors extending laterally beyond the lateral limit of the internal carotid artery; Type 3 (n = 4): giant tumors arising from the infratemporal fossa and/or the pterygopalatine fossa, with extension toward both intracranial and paranasal spaces; and Type 4 (n = 4): large invasive clival tumors compressing the brainstem posteriorly. We analyzed the surgical results, postoperative complications, and outcomes with SCENaTCS to clarify the surgical advantages and technical pitfalls. The Karnofsky performance status score improved from preoperative state (mean: 79.6 ± 18.5) to 6 months after surgery (mean: 85.4 ± 12.5). Excluding patients who died of malignant transformation, the disease was controlled in most patients during a median follow-up period of 62.5 months. SCENaTCS is a safe and effective surgical option for the treatment of highly complicated skull base tumors. Intraoperative cooperation and communication between both surgeons and operating room set-ups that avoid interference between the surgeons are important to ensure comfortable surgical environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41882162What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.