Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41882162›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2026

Simultaneous combined endonasal and transcranial surgery for large skull base tumors invading multiple regions: combination variations, pros and cons, and surgical results.

Kiyohiko Sakata, Tetsuya Negoto, Aya Hashimoto, Mie Sakai, Sosho Kajiwara, Yui Nagata, Kenji Takahashi, Motohiro Morioka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kiyohiko SakataDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, 830-0011 Asahi-machi 67, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan. kiyo@med.kurume-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2019-1732
Tetsuya NegotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, 830-0011 Asahi-machi 67, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3443-7513
Aya HashimotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, 830-0011 Asahi-machi 67, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.
Mie SakaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, 830-0011 Asahi-machi 67, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.
Sosho KajiwaraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, 830-0011 Asahi-machi 67, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5847-4573
Yui NagataDivision of Neurosurgery, St. Mary's Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0400-3693
Kenji TakahashiDivision of Neurosurgery, St. Mary's Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Motohiro MoriokaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, 830-0011 Asahi-machi 67, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7179-1258

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simultaneous combined endonasal and transcranial surgery (SCENaTCS) is an accepted treatment option for giant pituitary tumors to prevent postoperative intratumoral hemorrhage from residual tumors. For various skull base pathologies, especially tumors invading multiple regions, SCENaTCS may be applicable, with advantages equal to or greater than those of staged surgeries using either the same or a different surgical approach. Twenty-six consecutive SCENaTCS procedures for 24 patients with highly complex skull base tumors were classified into following four types on anatomical basis: Type 1 (n = 8): giant pituitary tumors with a marked suprasellar component; Type 2 (n = 10): midline parasellar tumors extending laterally beyond the lateral limit of the internal carotid artery; Type 3 (n = 4): giant tumors arising from the infratemporal fossa and/or the pterygopalatine fossa, with extension toward both intracranial and paranasal spaces; and Type 4 (n = 4): large invasive clival tumors compressing the brainstem posteriorly. We analyzed the surgical results, postoperative complications, and outcomes with SCENaTCS to clarify the surgical advantages and technical pitfalls. The Karnofsky performance status score improved from preoperative state (mean: 79.6 ± 18.5) to 6 months after surgery (mean: 85.4 ± 12.5). Excluding patients who died of malignant transformation, the disease was controlled in most patients during a median follow-up period of 62.5 months. SCENaTCS is a safe and effective surgical option for the treatment of highly complicated skull base tumors. Intraoperative cooperation and communication between both surgeons and operating room set-ups that avoid interference between the surgeons are important to ensure comfortable surgical environments.

Indexed as

Neurosurgical ProceduresPituitary NeoplasmsSkull Base NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultendonasal approachendoscopeexoscopesimultaneous combined surgeryskull base tumorstranscranial approach

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.