ArticleLeukemia2026
A Perturb-seq map of a differentiation hub reveals synergistic vulnerabilities in KMT2A-rearranged acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Leukemia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
KMT2A-rearranged acute myeloid leukemia is driven by epigenetic dependencies yet remains clinically resistant to therapies targeting individual regulators, indicating that resistance reflects compensatory regulation across an epigenetic network. A systematic understanding of this compensatory network has been lacking. To address this gap, we utilized Perturb-seq screening to systematically map the functional architecture of this network. We uncovered a compensatory epigenetic circuit, where a synergistic hub including KAT6A, Menin, and DOT1L converges to silence a core differentiation program (the 'Myeloid Program'), thereby maintaining leukemic identity. The activity of this program strongly correlated with favorable survival in large patient cohorts. While individual perturbations of hub components only partially derepress this program, their simultaneous pharmacological inhibition collapses the circuit's buffering capacity, leading to robust reactivation of the Myeloid Program and potent synergistic anti-leukemic activity. Our model also shows that disruption of antagonistic regulators of the Myeloid Program, such as the PRC1.1 component PCGF1, confers strong resistance to DOT1L inhibition. Finally, the Myeloid Program is a predictive biomarker, where high baseline activity defined a vulnerable state that could be selectively targeted by MEK, AKT, and mTOR inhibitors. Together, these findings establish a framework for identifying circuit-level epigenetic compensation and for rationally designing precision combination therapies that restore differentiation or target state-dependent vulnerabilities in acute myeloid leukemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.