ArticleScientific reports2026
Psychological-physical synergy of athletes based on artificial intelligence and deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address the challenge of accurately and reliably monitoring individuals' psychological states from multimodal physiological signals, this study aims to solve two core issues of existing deep learning methods: the lack of collaborative modeling and the unreliability of prediction results. This study proposes an innovative framework named Graph Attention-Bayesian Temporal Network (GABT-Net). First, the method uses Graph Attention Network (GAT) to construct each moment's multi-source physiological signals into a "physiological collaboration graph" to explicitly capture the instantaneous collaborative relationships among various indicators. Then, it introduces Bayesian Transformer and performs probabilistic prediction on the time series of collaborative states through Monte Carlo (MC) Dropout technology, thereby realizing the quantification of the model's own uncertainty. Experimental verification conducted on the public Wearable Stress and Affect Detection (WESAD) dataset shows that the GABT-Net model achieves an average accuracy of 96.2% and a macro-average F1-score of 0.9431, both of which outperform the baseline models. In terms of reliability, the Expected Calibration Error (ECE) of this model is 0.021, and the prediction accuracy on samples with the highest confidence reaches 99.10%. Ablation experiment and graph construction strategy analysis further verify the key role of GAT collaborative modeling and Bayesian time series module in performance and reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.