ArticleCommunications biology2026
DNA-based identification of plants and the genomic nature of plant species differences.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Plant species identification by genome skimming across the vascular plant tree of life.The New phytologist · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Telling species apart using DNA sequence data plays a key role in understanding, monitoring, and managing biodiversity. However, plant species discrimination is often difficult due to the complex nature of plant species boundaries. To inform future strategies for DNA-based identification of plants using the nuclear genome and to gain fundamental insights into the genomic nature of differences between plant species, we conducted a large-scale analysis mining data from 151 studies. Of the 1713 multiple-sampled species evaluated, 1202 resolved as monophyletic (70.2%). We then assessed the density of species-specific SNPs (SSSNPs) in the DNA sequence data - of the 462 species from 27 genera assessed in detail, there was a median density of 193 SSSNPs per Mb and 412 species (89.2%) had at least one SSSNP. Randomly sub-sampling the SNP data showed an asymptote in species discrimination with around 3000 randomly selected SNPs. Finally, we undertook a resampling of 6 target-capture datasets and showed that 1-9 pre-selected loci provided equivalent levels of species discrimination compared to hundreds of nuclear loci. These findings provide an important quantitative assessment of the genomic nature of differences between plant species and provide foundations for the development of enhanced approaches for high-resolution DNA-based plant species discrimination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.