ArticleScientific reports2026
Mini-batch size sensitivity in deep residual networks for short-term load forecasting: an empirical study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mini-batch size is a fundamental yet often empirically selected training configuration in deep learning (DL)–based short-term load forecasting (STLF). Despite the widespread adoption of deep residual networks (DRNs) for STLF, the sensitivity of forecasting performance to mini-batch size has received limited systematic investigation. This study presents a comprehensive empirical analysis of mini-batch size effects in DRN-based STLF, using the original DRN and the Principal Component Analysis–Deep Residual Network (PCA-DRN) as representative frameworks. Experiments are conducted on real-world electricity load datasets representing different climatic conditions under a unified experimental setting, where network architecture, loss function, optimizer, and training epochs are strictly controlled and only the mini-batch size is varied. The results demonstrate that both DRN and PCA-DRN exhibit pronounced sensitivity to mini-batch size, with medium-scale batches achieving superior forecasting performance. In particular, a mini-batch size of 64 consistently yields the best results, while a batch size of 32 provides a robust alternative. Comparative evaluations with representative DL baseline models further highlight the effectiveness of residual-based forecasting. Bootstrap-based statistical significance testing confirms that the observed performance improvements are reliable and reproducible. Overall, this study provides practical guidance on mini-batch size selection for residual-network-based STLF and offers new insights into training configuration effects in DL-driven STLF across different climatic electricity systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.