ArticleScientific reports2026
Comparative morphological, genomic, and functional characterization of two newly isolated lytic caudoviricetes phages targeting Escherichia coli and Salmonella.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic and functional characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Seasonal metabolomics and antibacterial activity ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foodborne Salmonella enterica and pathogenic Escherichia coli remain major hazards across the farm-to-fork continuum, motivating targeted bacteriophage biocontrol. We isolated two lytic, contractile-tailed phages in Ajman, UAE, CF01 from camel feces and SW01 from municipal sewage and characterized their host range, replication kinetics, and genomes. SW01 lysed only its Salmonella host, whereas CF01 infected multiple E. coli strains and several Salmonella isolates, with efficiency of plating (EOP) indicating high infectivity on E. coli and variable but generally reduced efficiency on Salmonella. One-step growth assays showed SW01 had short latent period (10–20 min), large burst (8–10 × 103 PFU/infected cell), and plateau 3 × 109 PFU/mL at 70–80 min, with an optimal MOI of 0.01. CF01 displayed a 20–30 min latent period, burst 2–3 × 102, plateau 2 × 108 PFU/mL, and optimal MOI 0.1; adsorption was faster than SW01. Illumina MiSeq/Unicycler assemblies yielded single-contig genomes: CF01, 142,427 bp (43.29% GC); SW01, 84,506 bp (44.74% GC). No rRNA genes, CRISPR arrays, integrase/repressor markers, or antimicrobial-resistance determinants were detected under the applied thresholds. Phylogenomic analysis placed CF01 within Salmonella-infecting myoviruses, whereas SW01 formed a distinct lineage more closely related to Erwinia-infecting phages. These results indicate complementary utility: high productivity and low-MOI efficacy of SW01 favor rapid clearance, while CF01 showed broader host range and fast adsorption support inclusion in cocktails. Strictly lytic genomes and favorable kinetics motivate further development of SW01 and CF01 for food-safety applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.