ArticleScientific reports2026
Lightweight multiscale behavior recognition for caged laying hens using an enhanced YOLOv8 framework.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents a lightweight deep-learning framework for recognizing key health-related behaviors of caged laying hens, addressing the challenges of dense housing, frequent occlusions, and subtle action differences. Building upon YOLOv8n (serving as our base model), we introduce three major enhancements: (1) a C2f-FasterNet-EMA backbone that improves multiscale feature extraction; (2) a FasterNet-based neck combined with the Dysample upsampler to refine small-object localization while reducing computational cost; (3) an EMASlideLoss function that alleviates sample imbalance and stabilizes the training process. Evaluated on the Lukou Dataset, which includes four target behaviors (eating, open-mouth breathing, self-pecking, and mutual pecking), the improved model achieves mAP@50 scores of 98.15%, 81.03%, 93.65%, and 94.32% for each behavior, respectively. Overall, compared with the retrained baseline YOLOv8n under identical experimental settings, the proposed method attains a 2.26% improvement in overall mAP@50 while reducing the model size by 22.92% relative to the baseline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.