Articlenpj aging2026
Protein intake and its interaction with dietary patterns on clinical outcomes among older adults.
Article in npj aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protein Consumption and Cognitive Health in Aging: Associations with Sarcopenia and Dietary Options, a Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2026Review
- "At Least the Second Plate": rethinking nutritional care in the geriatric unit.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adequate protein intake is increasingly recognized as a key determinant of healthy aging, yet its independent and diet-dependent effects on functional decline and mortality remain uncertain. Using data from 532 adults aged ≥65 years in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, we examined cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between multiple protein-related parameters and clinical outcomes over six years. We also evaluated whether protein intake modified or mediated the effects of two healthy dietary patterns-the Mediterranean diet (MED) and the World Health Organization Quality Diet Index (WHO-QDI). Results indicated that high protein intake, whether adjusted for body weight ( ≥ 0.8-1.0 g/kg/day) or expressed relative to total energy consumption ( ≥ 18%), was consistently associated with lower risks of falls, mobility limitations, activities of daily living (ADL) disability, frailty status, declines in walking speed, and mortality. Protein intake, particularly from animal sources, also mediated beneficial associations between the MED diet and WHO-QDI with mobility outcomes. These findings underscore protein intake-especially at or above 1.0 g/kg/day and with substantial contributions from high-quality animal proteins-as a key component of dietary strategies aimed at preserving physical function and promoting healthy aging.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.