ArticleScientific reports2026
Estimation of surface PM
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is a significant air pollutant in the Indo Gangetic Basin (IGB), where levels frequently exceed national and WHO air quality standards. Ground observations from 183 CPCB automatic stations, along with MERRA-2 reanalysis products and meteorological variables, were utilized in this study to analyse PM2.5 characteristics over a recent decade for the period from 2014–2023. A machine learning (ML) framework was developed using Random Forest, Extra Trees, LightGBM, and a stacking ensemble model to improve surface PM2.5 estimation in four major IGB cities: Delhi, Kanpur, Lucknow, and Patna. It is found that the raw MERRA-2 estimates systematically underestimated PM2.5, with R2 values of only 0.28–0.42 and RMSE as high as 82 µg m−3. By contrast, the stacking ensemble achieved R2 values of 0.79–0.82, FAC2 above 0.94, RMSE reduced to 27–31 µg m−3, and near-zero bias (1.7–2.3 µg m−3). The model successfully reproduced extreme winter pollution episodes as well as monsoon conditions, highlighting the critical role of meteorological parameters such as boundary layer height, wind speed, and precipitation in regulating PM2.5 variability. Trajectory clustering and concentration-weighted trajectory (CWT) analysis showed that north-westerly transport contributes 55–65% of wintertime PM2.5 in Delhi, Kanpur, and Lucknow, while Patna is affected by both regional inflows and local sources. Major contributing regions include Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan, and the Nepal plains, associated with crop residue burning and dust transport. By integrating ground observations, reanalysis data, meteorological predictors, and atmospheric transport analysis, this study provides a robust framework for improving PM2.5 prediction and identifying dominant pollution sources in the IGB. The results provide scientific evidence for designing both regional and city-specific mitigation strategies to reduce exposure in one of the world’s most polluted and densely populated regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.