ArticleScientific reports2026
PrimerAST: A predictive machine learning tool for primer design and quality assessment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the critical prerequisites for efficient PCR-based diagnosis in a molecular laboratory is accurate primer design. The conventional primer design process relies on rule-based algorithms to provide primer features without capturing the complex interactions between various properties to determine primer functionality. Also, the manual inspection of each feature is difficult and time-consuming. Here, we present the Primer Assessment & Scoring Tool (PrimerAST), a pipeline with a machine learning model for automatically designing primers and evaluating the functional efficiency for PCR applications. This tool was developed by integrating experimentally designed primers (labelled as verified) and synthetically generated primer pairs (labelled as predicted to fail) (N = 316) to create the dataset. A total of 16 different features generated during the process of primer design were used as engineered features. Four supervised machine learning models were examined with 10-fold cross-validation. Upon training and testing, the support vector machine and gradient boosting models showed the highest performance based on six evolution metrics on independent testing datasets, with mean area-under-the-curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 across folds. This suggests robustness of PrimerAST to capture the various interactions between primer features to predict the efficiency of primer design. The PrimerAST is an available online tool ( https://primerast.streamlit.app/ ) that can significantly enhance PCR primer design by providing machine-learning–guided evaluation of several design features.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.