ArticleNature communications2026
Anterior and posterior retrosplenial cortex form distinct visuospatial circuits in the mouse.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- SEX-DEPENDENT MODULATION OF WHOLE BRAIN cFOS EXPRESSION BY LIGHT AND MELANOPSIN IN THE MOUSE.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The retrosplenial cortex (RSC) integrates sensory and mnemonic information to support spatial orientation and navigation, yet how visuospatial processing differs across its subregions remains unclear. Here, we combined cellular imaging in navigating mice with brain-wide anatomical input tracing to characterize how multimodal sensory and positional signals are integrated along the anterior-posterior axis of dorsal RSC. We identified consistent differences between anterior and posterior subregions in both functional response properties and long-range connectivity. Anterior RSC neurons displayed sharper and more reliable position tuning during tactile-cued navigation and preferential sensitivity to fast, low-spatial-frequency visual motion. In contrast, posterior RSC neurons showed broader position selectivity, stronger responses to slow, high-spatial-frequency visual patterns, and enhanced tuning in visually immersive virtual environments. Consistent with these differences, anterior RSC received denser projections from motor, somatosensory, and parietal areas, whereas posterior RSC received stronger input from primary and posteromedial visual cortices. Together, these findings identify an anterior-posterior functional gradient in RSC, with subregions differing in how they integrate sensory and positional signals during navigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.