ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2026
Tunable flexible capacitive sensor for dynamic pressure monitoring.
Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Monolithic Janus Hydrogel Pressure Sensor for Wearable Motion and Physiological Monitoring.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Flexible Capacitive Pressure Sensors with Ultrasonically Engineered Cu-Filled PDMS Dielectric Layers.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Flexible capacitive pressure sensors have gained widespread application in health monitoring, robotics, and structural diagnostics. However, conventional designs that rely on flat or micropatterned dielectric layers typically offer high sensitivity only at low pressures and possess limited tunability, which makes them unsuitable for dynamic or harsh environments. In this study, we present a tunable capacitive pressure sensor fabricated via buckling-guided assembly and laser cutting, which transforms 2D precursors into 3D cage-like architectures. The sensor exhibits pressure-dependent sensitivity, characterized by low sensitivity under small loads and significantly enhanced sensitivity at higher loads due to nonlinear variations in electrode spacing. It achieves outstanding performance, including high durability over 6000 cycles, a low detection limit (~2 Pa), minimal hysteresis (~4%), and rapid response and recovery times (131/140 ms). Finite element analysis and experimental validation confirm the tunable mechanical response and accurate electromechanical behavior enabled by geometric design. The sensor also allows reversible tuning through lateral strain and liquid encapsulation, enhancing environmental robustness. Moreover, a compression-induced rotation mechanism further improves sensitivity by increasing electrode overlap during loading. Wind tunnel experiments validate the sensor's performance under extreme conditions, demonstrating strong potential for practical applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.