ReviewCell death & disease2026
The cGAS-STING pathway in cancer: friend or foe.
Review in Cell death & disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- FGFR1 Suppresses STING-Mediated Interferon Response in Endocrine Therapy-Resistant Breast Cancer.Cancer research communications · 2026Article
- Natural-Inspired Engineered Microalgae With Selenium Enrichment Enabled Potent Anti-Tumor Immunity.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Revisiting tumor immunogenicity through the lens of mutant p53: Implications for cancer immunotherapy.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026Review
- Immune response to DNA and RNA: structural insights, molecular mechanisms, and therapeutic targeting.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Research progress on VDAC2 in mitochondrial dysfunction-related diseases.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- The emerging role of oncolytic virotherapy in genitourinary malignancies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cGAS-STING pathway is crucial for recognizing aberrant DNA in the cytoplasm and activating the innate immune response. After detecting aberrant DNA in the cytoplasm, cGAS can catalyze the synthesis of cGAMP from ATP and GTP, which acts as a second messenger to engage STING and unleash type I interferons, thereby eliciting a robust antitumor immune cascade. In recent years, the role of the cGAS-STING pathway in tumor immunity has attracted widespread attention. Paradoxically, it not only activates antitumor immune responses but also promotes tumor progression under certain circumstances. This review untangles the safeguards that prevent cGAS from recognizing nuclear self-DNA, delineates the antitumor and pro-tumor mechanisms of the cGAS-STING axis, and surveys tumor immunotherapy strategies targeting this pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.