ArticleMedical physics2026
Predicting ventilation from single breathing phase non-contrast CT using Swin Transformers.
Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPulmonary ventilation imaging enables functional avoidance radiotherapy treatment plans by quantifying regional lung function. However, current clinical standards, such as 99𝑚Tc-based single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), rely on radioactive tracers, which can introduce imaging deposition artifacts. CT ventilation imaging (CTVI) methods based on both physical models and deep learning approaches currently require multiple CT images as input, such as the inhale/exhale phases of a 4DCT. While the theoretical foundation of physics-based CTVI is built on multi-phase information, the feasibility of single-phase deep learning CTV models has not been determined. PURPOSE: While deep learning methods have predicted SPECT ventilation from multi-phase 4DCT, the benefit of including more than one respiratory phase remains unclear. Predicting ventilation using only single-phase CTs reduces computational expense, potentially simplifies the image acquisition process, and avoids artifacts introduced by image registration, thereby making deep learning-based CTV approaches more feasible for clinical applications outside of radiotherapy. This study (1) develops a deep learning model to predict SPECT ventilation using only the inhale phase of non-contrast 4DCT and (2) evaluates the impact of adding the exhale phase.
methodsWe developed a SwinUNETR-based architecture using the maximum inhale 4DCT phase to predict pulmonary ventilation. A total of 44 cases with paired inhale CT and SPECT scans were used in the training. To assess multi-phase benefits, we compared: (1) InhaleCT-Swin Model-trained on inhale CT only; (2) ExhaleCT-Swin Model-trained on exhale CT only; (3) Hybrid Models IECT-Swin-FTD, IECT-Swin-FTDE, IECT-Swin-FTDES, fine-tuned on inhale/exhale CT pairs (IECT) with varying network components updated. A standard U-Net was also trained on inhale CT (InhaleCT-UNet), exhale CT (ExhaleCT-UNet), and IECT (IECT-UNet) for cross-architecture evaluation.
resultsThe SwinUNETR-based Hybrid Model, IECT-Swin-FTD, achieved mean voxel-wise Spearman correlation of 0.762 ± 0.035, outperforming the current state-of-the-art methods. Our transformer-based model trained on inhale CT slightly outperformed exhale CT with no significant differences (
conclusionsA transformer-based model with its decoder fine-tuned on IECT (IECT-Swin-FTD) achieved state-of-the-art accuracy for SPECT ventilation prediction. Moreover, our InhaleCT-Swin Model achieved comparable results with widely used UNet-based models that require multi-phase CT, showing that single CT may be sufficient for accurate ventilation prediction and may improve clinical workflow by reducing acquisition requirements and registration-related artifacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.